Free teacher evaluation form template
Eight statements on one agreement grid, for a full end-of-term evaluation in ninety seconds.
- 7 questions
- Single page
- Free, unlimited responses
Opens in your dashboard with the whole form in front of you. Nothing is created until you say so. Keep it, restyle it, or pick a different one.
Updated October 7, 2026
Try it in another theme
Ships in Mono · 26 to choose from
Tap any theme to see this form wearing it.
What this faculty & teaching evaluation asks, and why
Students choose the module, then rate eight statements on a single agreement grid, which takes one glance instead of eight screens. Statements about the course and about the teaching are separate rows, so a strong teacher with weak material, or the reverse, shows up clearly. A required question asks how the workload felt. Two open questions ask what should be kept and the one thing to change, and a 0 to 10 question asks how likely they are to recommend the module to students in the year below. A last question asks permission to quote their comments in the module review.
- Questions
- 7, 3 required
- Format
- Single page
- Theme
- Mono, or any of 26
- Cost
- Free, no response cap
The 7 questions it asks
In order, with their field types and why each one is there. Edit, reorder or delete any of them once it's yours.
- Which module is this for?Dropdown · Module 1, Module 2, Module 3 +3Required
Comes first so every response is tied to a module. Edit the list to your own modules and electives before sending.
- How much do you agree with each of these?MatrixRequired
Eight statements on one agreement scale, answered at a glance. Edit the rows to match your institution's evaluation instrument.
- How was the workload?Multiple choice · Far too light, A bit light, About right +2Required
Five points from 'far too light' to 'far too heavy'. Workload complaints are common and this makes them measurable.
- What worked, and should be kept?Long textOptional
What should survive the next revision. Answers here protect the parts of a module that work from being cut.
- What one thing would you change?Long textOptional
One change, not a list. Asking for a single thing produces the most important improvement rather than every minor one.
- How likely are you to recommend this module to someone in the year below?NPS (0–10)Optional
A 0–10 recommendation aimed at next year's students, which makes the question concrete rather than abstract.
- Happy for a quote to be used in the module review?Multiple choice · Yes, that's fine, No, please don'tOptional
Asks permission before any comment is quoted in a module review, so students can be candid without being exposed.
Built for these jobs, and easy to bend to yours
- End-of-term module evaluation
- Course review before it runs again
- Training and CPD feedback
- Any evaluation using an agreement scale
Ways to adapt it
Training and CPD sessions
Replace the module list with session names and soften the statements for workplace training rather than taught modules.
Mid-module check
Keep the grid and the 'one thing to change' question and run it halfway through, when there is still time to adjust.
Translated for international cohorts
On Pro, add other languages to the same form so every student can answer in the language they are most comfortable with.
How to get good answers from a faculty & teaching evaluation
- 1
Run it in the final week of teaching
Not after exams, when results color the answers. The final week is late enough to judge the module and early enough that people still attend.
- 2
Keep the grid statements fixed
Departments compare modules and years on the same statements. Change one and that row stops being comparable.
- 3
Report modules separately
Search the responses by module name before reading the grid. Averaged across modules, a struggling one disappears into the overall score.
- 4
Quote only with consent
Use the last question's answer to decide which comments can appear in a review, and leave the rest out.
After you publish
Where the responses go next
Close it before results
Set a closing date at the end of teaching so no responses arrive after marks are released. Free on every plan.
Read the grid by module
The dashboard breaks down every row of the agreement grid, so weak statements stand out for each module.
Hand it to the review panel
Export to CSV for the module review, keeping only the comments where students gave permission to quote.
Faculty & Teaching Evaluation: common questions
Still deciding?
Rating, NPS, ranking and matrix questions, with completion analytics on every plan.
How is this different from a course evaluation?
It puts eight statements on one agreement grid and adds workload and a recommendation question, so it works as a full end-of-term evaluation rather than a quick rating.
Is a teacher evaluation anonymous?
It asks for no identifying details, and FormSnapp does not store an IP address with a response. Comments are only quoted where students said yes.
Can I change the grid statements?
Yes. Both the rows and the agreement scale are editable, so the grid can match an evaluation instrument your department already uses.
Can one form cover several modules?
Yes. The first question asks which module the response is for, and searching the responses by module name shows each one's answers.
Does a matrix question work on a phone?
It does, though a grid is denser on a small screen. Keep the statements short so each row stays readable on mobile.
Related templates
- Customer FeedbackA quick star rating and two open questions about what worked and what didn't.5 questions · Single page
- Course EvaluationEnd-of-course feedback that separates the course from the person teaching it.6 questions · Single page
- Feature RequestCollect ideas and let people rank what matters most to them.5 questions · Single page
Ready to create forms people actually answer?
Beautiful forms, unlimited responses, and real insight, all free to start. No credit card, no catch.
Free forever · or explore templates first